Saturday September 6 2008
Counter-Strike
Official Design Partner

GotFrag eSports Forums

Source is so hopeless

1
63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking
+109 Frags
+   -

This fall source will have been out for 4 years. In those 4 years the newer and "more revolutionary, better looking" game has not taken over, and the teams that went to play that game for money are coming back to the older, more vulgar, primitive looking game.

just saying source kids, you fail.
The "*PEW* *PEW* *PEW* *PEW* ^^FIREWORKXZZZZ^^" Guy.

3
6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking
+52 Frags
+   -

+frag for every anti-source thread
4
47% Ranking 47% Ranking 47% Ranking 47% Ranking
+48 Frags
+   -

+frag for every anti-source thread

6
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
+32 Frags
+   -

1.6 > sauce any day
,,i,, ^_^ ,,i,,

8
102% Ranking 102% Ranking 102% Ranking 102% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

Source is good if you want to have some fun and frag some noobs, but 1.6 is for competitive.
Gexrtsa
9
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
+18 Frags
+   -

i laughed so hard at #5's 30 fps engine comment. WTF IS A 30 FPS ENGINE RETARD?
guns don't kill people, minorities with guns kill people

11
15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

You shouldn't have to run 1.6 on 30 fps..
#20 - Carlos Quentin <333
12
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
+8 Frags
+   -

WRONG joe--... no engine is made to run well at 30 FPS. have you ever played source at 30 FPS? if so then you'll know it doesn't run well. think about what you said then try again.
guns don't kill people, minorities with guns kill people
13
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
+3 Frags
+   -

#7 are you dumb enough to believe those stats?? also that it maybe only true for north america.. but with col returning no source anymore you baddies .... the rest of the world plays 1.6 and no one cares for source
wallexoon= walle+lex+moon= insanestest of players
14
54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking
+12 Frags
+   -

#7 Actually, the Source community is decreasing while 1.6 is growing.

Check it out: http://www.onlinegamingzeitgeist.com/games/
MYM:"[Counter-Strike Source is]a game that we no longer consider a professional game with a future".
15
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
+6 Frags
+   -

the way i see it, source is a game that was taken way too seriously. it's a kids game. like bf heroes is to the rest of the battlefield series.
teach me stuff, please.
16
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

Everyone knows that the steam stats are incorrect, and plenty of engines are made to run well at 30 fps considering the developers have to consider everyone's hardware and devlop something that will run on a wide range of PC's most will have to run low settings but as long as it runs and sells.
17
41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Seriously there are two really good 1.6 tournaments going on at the moment and the only thing you can think to post is a thread about source. Your preaching to the converted here, forget about it.
18
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
+9 Frags
+   -

i don't care what ANY OF YOU SAY. an engine isn't developed to run at 30 FPS. developers give you options to optimize your FPS in the form of decreasing resolution, details and texture settings in case you have terrible outdated hardware. i mean, think about it. If you put all of this time developing something that could render beautiful, jaw dropping scenes, would you want it to run best at 30 FPS? no. you'd want it to run as fast as possible.
guns don't kill people, minorities with guns kill people
19
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
+3 Frags
+   -

thx for the info
20
18% Ranking 18% Ranking 18% Ranking 18% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Thanks for the info! ;)
list of proplayers settings and configs -> http://www.gotfrag.com/cs/xact/user/buddy..
21
7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking
+8 Frags
+   -

There was a thread made about a week or two ago that showed their was a increase in 1.6 over source and it was some hardcore calculations and took everything into account that you can so YOU ARE WRONG.

#1 1.6 > source always has been always will be in every way shape and form including a competitive format.

#2 They sold out, but for 30k just for being there + additional sponsors,endorsements, and other large cash prizes you can't blame them + the fact most of them have been playing "professional cs" for a long time I am sure they wanted to help e-sports but they picked the wrong way, once again you cant blame them though.

#3 CGS will fail, at least with CS:S and hopefully that will be a full return of 1.6 teams/players even if they don't have their old names because they sold it to the CGS but WHO GIVES A SHIT!

#4 The 1.6 community worldwide > source and competitive CS might have taken a turn for the worse in america but for the rest of the world it is certainly continuing on its strong path and like I said previously hopefully with the return of some of the 1.6 teams and maybe a FULL return of col to 1.6 which may not happen it would def bring a lot of ppl over.

I mean think about it, some people converted to source just because of the top teams going, now figure all of those gay kids + the source kids who would come to 1.6 just because of their top teams!

LOL SOURCE IS FAIL JUST ACCEPT IT AND MOVE ON!
WHAT UP H0SS!?!?!
22
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

It should be enough that YOU know what game is better. Trying to bash or convince everybody else that 1.6 is better gives the opposition there first reason to ignore you. You take this way too seriously. Understand that no matter what is said, most people will end up doing whatever the hell they want to do anyways.

Source is for baddies, but I knew that from the first time I played it.

This comment was edited at 07/25/2008 10:59 AM
23
14% Ranking 14% Ranking 14% Ranking 14% Ranking
+11 Frags
+   -

whats with all the walls of text.

+frag for every anti-source thread

that is all.
your awpertunity cost is my crosshair.
24
62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking
+8 Frags
+   -

+frag for every anti-source thread

rofl.
w a f f l e s.
25
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

It's funny how the 10 year old CS is still better than the 4 year old CS:S
HBSR @ #danielvutran
26
53% Ranking 53% Ranking 53% Ranking 53% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#14, perhaps you might notice that the increases coincide with breaks from school. it seems to be long-time players coming back to play during the summer/holidays when they're not so busy.
i quit cs, yet im better than you. :[
27
63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

LOLOOLOL
The "*PEW* *PEW* *PEW* *PEW* ^^FIREWORKXZZZZ^^" Guy.
28
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
-4 Frags
+   -

CSS hasnt failed, it just isnt the top pick for competitive CS. To valve its a cash cow. anyone who started CS in the last 4 years play source. they come from other games to source. rarely 1.6 -> CSS. The pubbers might have made the transition as well because there not playing cs for its tiny details that make a difference in 5v5.